Pressing Delete Won't Eliminate the Truth
From ICE agent crimes to climate change, Jan. 6 and hunger in America, the Trump regime is working to deny the public knowledge to confront its crimes and failures
The funny thing is the Trump operatives probably imagine their authoritarian tricks are working. But refusing to investigate ICE murders and other violent confrontations involving federal agents doesn’t mean these encounters aren’t happening. Deleting data about climate change, pregnancy risks, dangerous chemicals in the environment and rising levels of hunger won’t make these problems go away. Nor will deleting facts collected on websites about the violent attacks on Jan. 6 change the terrible truth of that day’s horror.
Yet the Trump regime—determined to hide its failures and pretend that real problems can simply be erased—is expanding its assault on the truth nonetheless. While it may be one of the oldest tricks in the authoritarian playbook, Trump’s henchmen are running their pernicious operation over and over. As if we cannot see what they are doing and their efforts to reject positive change won’t ultimately be their undoing.
Denying the public its right to know enables corrupt and criminal actors to get away with their abuses and undermine democracy. That includes the continuing coverup of the Epstein files in order to protect the rich and powerful involved in child rape and other sex crimes.
The latest assault on truth, reported yesterday by The New York Times, involves stopping FBI investigations of violent incidents involving immigration agents. This would “sharply limit law enforcement scrutiny of immigration agents, as the Trump administration draws mounting criticism over killings at the hands of federal officers,” note reporters Devlin Barrett and Hamed Aleaziz. This follows two murders by ICE agents in Texas and Maine over the last two weeks.
This shift was reportedly delivered in a written notice to FBI managers around the country. Such investigations, the Times noted, “can provide a crucial means of gathering evidence implicating the agents themselves.”
While both the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) denied the change, this policy would leave it up to DHS to essentially investigate itself, thereby making it harder to hold its agents accountable for any criminal activity, be it murder or otherwise.
This comes as the Trump White House is pressuring prosecutors to expand charges against protestors, in fact insisting that anyone making physical contact with a federal agent should be charged with felony assault, a crime that carries a sentence of up to eight years. A Times investigation published Saturday found that of 400 resolved cases involving these assault charges, “nearly half have unraveled: Juries acquitted defendants, judges threw out charges, or prosecutors withdrew them.”
If true, this latest effort continues the regime’s pattern of amassing power and control by degrading the public’s capacity to know what’s true and what’s not—and making it harder to hold it accountable. Consider these examples from this second Trump term:
Last July legally mandated national climate change assessments were removed from government websites—data relied on by decision-makers and those working to mitigate climate risks.
Earlier this month, the Department of Energy removed more than 1,600 webpages that provided guidance for people to cope with heatwaves by saving energy and keeping electricity costs down.
Until last year, according to a Guardian report, people could find out if they live near one of some 12,000 structures storing hazardous, cancer-causing chemicals used to manufacture pesticides or medical devices. But the tool providing such information about the toxic chemicals, which is disproportionately likely to affect poor and minority communities, was taken down.
The same Guardian report found that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stopped tracking dangers to pregnant women that caused an increase in maternal and infant deaths. The lack of survey data, gathered in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), also disproportionately harms women and babies in poorer states with high infant mortality rates and other poor health outcomes.
The Trump regime also ended a comprehensive annual survey that tracked food insecurity and hunger in America, a review that has been completed every year since 1995. This was ended as Trump’s Big Ugly Bill last year made the largest cuts in history to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) that 42 million Americans rely upon.
In May, the Justice Department mass-deleted news releases documenting guilty pleas, jury verdicts and prison sentences involving Jan. 6 defendants, just another effort to rewrite the facts of that heinous day. The department, led by Todd Blanche, proudly stated that it was removing “partisan propaganda” and “reversing the DOJ’s weaponization under the Biden Administration.”
This is not the first time I’ve written about the authoritarian attacks on truth which put all of us at risk, but particularly our most vulnerable communities. In “The Intensified Assault on Factual Reality” published last August, I summarized what was knowable then:
This dangerous degradation—this war on legitimate measurement—follows an ongoing pattern of attacking researchers, agencies and watchdogs that produce disagreeable findings: Firing analysts who deliver intelligence reports he dislikes; rejecting the findings of the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office when it makes projections that don’t support his inflated boasts about the Big Beautiful Bill; firing Department of Education staff that collect data about student performance; cutting public health teams that report on substance abuse, mental health and maternal mortality; ending grants and firing scientists throughout the government; and stopping the collection of greenhouse gas emissions statistics as a precursor to cutting the regulations intended to slow the impact of climate change.
A functioning democratic society depends on evidence-based assessments to both make appropriate policy choices and hold officials who fail to serve the public’s interest accountable. The disappearance of data is part and parcel of the Trump regime’s efforts to erase Black history, reject people and policies that don’t align with its anti-woke, white supremacist push, and weaken the public’s ability to fight back.
Donald Trump and his pathetic sycophants may be convinced that they’ve got the upper hand. But don’t believe it. Their need to bury facts highlights their fear of the truth and what an informed electorate can do to bring an end to their hateful agenda and the lies they tell.
As I wrote last August:
The best way through this is straight ahead. That requires expanding media literacy, supporting independent journalism that relies on facts, backing endangered public media, and holding accountable government officials who are participating in this desecration of our systems and databases. We cannot give in to this regime’s goal of convincing us that we are powerless to fight back. We must not allow ourselves to ignore what our eyes, ears and brains are telling us.
This is a daily battle. But we can strengthen our capacity to investigate and prosecute these thugs on Nov. 3, just 105 days from today. Stay strong!
Value the writing here? Please consider becoming a paid subscriber for $50 a year or just $5 a month, if you’re not already. This helps sustain and expand the work of America, America, keep nearly all the content free for everyone and give you full access to the comments sections.



Lately, I’ve seen more articles about people leaving the country, or wanting to leave and I’ll admit to having that thought, especially since my husband has dual citizenship. We have talked about it at length and, at this point, have come to the conclusion that if a mass exodus of all dems and independents occurred, hundreds of millions of people could leave. Yet, as a thought experiment, what purpose would be served by upending our lives and emptying out the country if everyone (hypothetically) left? Would it defang this government? Probably. But not only would it be an impossible task, it would empty out more than the population. We would all be leaving behind this amazing experiment; this bond to our ideals, forged by hands we never met and defended by same, to say nothing of the economy. Still, I don’t mind saying that it entertains me as a revenge fantasy.
But you are correct. Just as this regime cannot, in Orwellian fashion, delete the “inconvenient truths”, neither can we delete the years of bravery and struggle of worn-out souls. We cannot delete what time has wrought, just as they cannot. Truth is something with which they cannot survive, but for us, it is the very essence of our survival.
We have to guard it against every foe. This is the lesson of our time. This is the well-tread path of the past and the warning for the future. As this regime builds permanent fencing to keep it out, we must build bridges to expand its reach.
Thank you, Steven, for all that you do to help us all do this!
105 days
This was one of my initial fears: the obliteration of history.
I never anticipated the overt elimination of tracking vital statistics, or dismantling weather tracking or hiding the locations of harmful chemicals industry locations.
I never anticipated the crusade of assaulting Truth to such an incredible extent it it would result in risking the health and safety of our people.
I never anticipated this level of cruelty from any leader and especially in the US.
Thank you. We need the information. Dark as it is.
Resolve to vote
💙🇺🇸💙